About Me

Name: Dawnsblood
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Some of our allies still have the fighting spirit.

PM John Howard just isn't gonna take it:

In a speech delivered last night for the 50th anniversary of the conservative magazine Quadrant, Mr Howard said the left had a history of denigrating the nation and was now doing the same with the war in Iraq, describing Islamic terrorism as the new tyranny.

He said Australian universities were still breeding leftists and described pro-communists of decades past as “ideological barrackers for regimes of oppression opposed to Australia and its interests”, Fairfax reports today.

Further from the transcript:

In the '60s and '70s, it largely gave way to a new Left counterculture, where again Quadrant served as a beacon of free and sceptical thought against fashionable leftist views on social, foreign policy and economic issues. In the eyes of the new Left, the Cold War became a struggle defined by moral equivalence, where the Soviet bloc and the American-led West were equally to blame, each possessing their own dominating ideologies. It became the height of intellectual sophistication to believe that people in the West were no less oppressed than people under the yoke of communist dictatorship.

In time, the world would luckily see the emergence of three remarkable individuals whose moral clarity punctured such nonsense: Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher and Pope John Paul II. All of us here tonight owe a particular debt of gratitude to these three towering figures of the late 20th century.



(Snip)

To those who want to portray the West as anti-Muslim, I would say that it was not the Arab League who went to war in the '90s on behalf of Muslim minorities in the Balkans. It was the governments of the US, the UK and their NATO allies. Let me also remind people who talk as if Iraq was some island of pro-Islamic tranquillity before 2003 that the person who probably killed more Muslims in history is Saddam Hussein.

There are people who legitimately opposed the original action to oust Saddam, but it remains an inconvenient truth that if countries such as the US, the UK and Australia simply abandon the people of Iraq, this would be a victory for the forces of terror and extremism.

This man gives one helluva speech!


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who needs Hugo Chavez?

American donors step up to help:

Businesses and people around the country are digging into their pockets to help four Alaska villages whose tribal leaders rejected a heating-fuel gift from the president of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, a critic of President George Bush.

Donations, including a huge one from several fishing companies, have been so numerous there might be enough to replace the gift -- and then some.

"The response has been overwhelming," said Dimitri Philemonof, president of the Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association, a nonprofit representing villages in Southwest Alaska.





Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ted Koppel thinks a nuclear Iran is just spiffy!

Koppel obviously believes that fear of an American counterstrike is enough to Iran in line:

The elimination of American opposition on this issue would open the way to genuine normalization between our two nations. It might even convince the Iranians that their country can flourish without nuclear weapons.

But this should also be made clear to Tehran: If a dirty bomb explodes in Milwaukee, or some other nuclear device detonates in Baltimore or Wichita, if Israel or Egypt or Saudi Arabia should fall victim to a nuclear "accident," Iran should understand that the U.S. government will not search around for the perpetrator. The return address will be predetermined, and it will be somewhere in Iran.

I am sure that is exactly the way
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad thinks:

Iran's dominant "Twelver" sect believes this will be Mohammed ibn Hasan, regarded as the 12th Imam, or righteous descendant of the Prophet Mohammad.

He is said to have gone into "occlusion" in the ninth century, at the age of five. His return will be preceded by cosmic chaos, war and bloodshed. After a cataclysmic confrontation with evil and darkness, the Mahdi will lead the world to an era of universal peace.

This is similar to the Christian vision of the Apocalypse. Indeed, the Hidden Imam is expected to return in the company of Jesus.

Mr Ahmadinejad appears to believe that these events are close at hand and that ordinary mortals can influence the divine timetable.

The prospect of such a man obtaining nuclear weapons is worrying. The unspoken question is this: is Mr Ahmadinejad now tempting a clash with the West because he feels safe in the belief of the imminent return of the Hidden Imam? Worse, might he be trying to provoke chaos in the hope of hastening his reappearance?


Sure we can trust this man with nuclear weapons, Ted?






Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bleg post

If you can spare:

Bath Towels - New, any color, unwashed
Fitted and Regular Sheets – New, unwashed, twin sized, any color - (even super hero)!
Pillows – New - Standard sized with pillow cases – New, unwashed, any color.

The main troop support hospital in Balad, Iraq could use your help. Contact info is here.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The GOP's secret weapon

Once again Scary old Karl Rove finds himself in the left's nightmares:

Thanks to aggressive redistricting in the 1990s and early 2000s, fewer than three dozen House seats are seriously in contention this election cycle, compared with more than 100 in 1994, the year Republicans swept to power with a 54-seat pickup in the House. Then there's what political pros call the ground game. For most of the 20th century, turning out voters on Election Day was the Democrats' strength. They had labor unions to supply workers for campaigns, make sure their voters had time off from their jobs to go to the polls and provide rides to get them there.

Now, though, Democrats are the ones playing catch-up when it comes to the mechanics of Election Day. Every Monday, überstrategist Karl Rove and Republican Party officials on Capitol Hill get spreadsheets tallying the numbers of voters registered, volunteers recruited, doors knocked on and phone numbers dialed for 40 House campaigns and a dozen Senate races. Over the next few weeks, the party will begin flying experienced paid and volunteer workers into states for the final push. The Senate Republicans' campaign committee calls its agents special teams, led by marshals, all in the service of the partywide effort known as the 72-Hour Task Force because its working philosophy initially focused on the final three days before an election.


Time does a great job (too good a job really) illustrating the GOP's formidable ground game. Hopefully it can live up to the reputation it is beginning to earn. Speaker Pelosi is a scary, scary thought.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Guantanamo Bay Live II

Patterico continues his interview with the Army major here:

Can the detainees be reasoned with? I asked. Or is their indoctrination so complete that there’s just no reaching them? Are there any of them who are reasonable enough that Stashiu would feel safe if we were to let them go free?

I don’t know that anyone is beyond reason, but I also don’t know more than a couple who I think might be ok to release. “Might” being the operative word there, I wouldn’t give the go-ahead on my own for any of them. There I are couple I could understand and would not go out of my way to protest their release. I can tell you that if I ever saw a detainee face-to-face here in the States, I would immediately assume that I was targeted and do my best to kill them without further warning. If I turned out to be wrong about their intent, I could live with that.

These are the "poor victims" we are holding at Gitmo. I wish the left would finally get this and help fight the enemy.




Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The US invaded Iraq to prevent the return of the Mahdi.

That is what Moqtada al-Sadr's followers believe:

Hojatoleslam al-Sadr and his advisers are convinced that the Americans want to destroy Islam and stop the Mahdi. “The Americans are trying to hijack Islamic movements. They think that these are serving the Mahdi’s interests. Whatever they did in Afghanistan and Iraq are all attempts to hijack the Mahdi’s return.”

And I thought we had the fooled with all this freedom and democracy jazz we have been peddling... ;)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Russians are getting back into the bombing game.

It seems the Russians are trying to rebuild their weakened power projection game:

    Russia recently conducted its first large scale heavy bomber exercises since the end of the Cold War. Some fifty Tu-160s, Tu-95MSs and Tu-22Ms were involved. Since 1991, most Russian heavy bombers have been kept on the ground. But in the last few years, a force of bombers was refurbished. This including getting some Tu-160s back from Ukraine (because half of the 36 Tu-160s built were stationed in Ukraine when the Soviet Union was dissolved, and thus belonged to Ukraine). Only about fourteen Tu-160s are still operational, plus about fifty Tu-22Ms and about the same number of Tu-95s. Exact numbers are not available on the Tu-22Ms and Tu-95s, because both of these aircraft serve other functions (reconnaissance, electronic warfare). Their ability to perform as heavy bombers depends on the current state of crew training and maintenance. Most of these aircraft are at least twenty years old, and spare parts are sometimes difficult to get.

It seems they have decided to invest some of that heightened oil money in their Air Forces. If I were a Russian neighboring country, I'd be a bit more nervous then I normally am. Remember
Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania are members of both NATO and the EU and all three are Russian neighbors.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Taliban and the British agree to secret "truce"

Not exactly sure what to make of this. I do know that Afghans typically quit fighting in the Fall/Winter and tend to ramp back up in the Spring/Summer, but then again suicide bombing was never their thing either. Anyways:

It has now been agreed the troops will quietly pull out of Musa Qala in return for the Taliban doing the same. The compound is one of four district government offices in the Helmand province that are being guarded by British troops.

Although soldiers on the ground may welcome the agreement, it is likely to raise new questions about troop deployment. Last month Sir Richard Dannatt, the new head of the British Army, warned that soldiers in Afghanistan were fighting at the limit of their capacity and could only “just” cope with the demands.

The locals seem serious though:

But there are clear signs of the commitment of the people of Musa Qala to the deal, with one Talib who stood out against it reportedly lynched by angry locals.

Update: It seems they don't normally cease attacks until December:

Over the past week or so, the rate of hostile incidents, though still higher than in comparable periods in the past, has declined rather noticeably. This is attributed to the onset of Ramadan. No one expects the relative lull to continue. The rate of attacks has always risen in October, as the Taliban tries to get in a few good blows before the onset of bad weather. By mid-December the harsh weather will make military operations extremely difficult in much of the country. By then, the Taliban would like to be able to control the maximum amount of territory, so that it can spend the Winter recruiting and indoctrinating fighters and preparing for next spring.
Meanwhile, despite having extensive borders with the Central Asian republics and Iran, virtually all insurgent activity is either in the eastern or southern regions of Afghanistan, along the Pakistani frontier. Only about 5-6 percent of incidents occur in the other half of the country.

 




Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I am sooo glad Frist is out.

Bill Frist showed his intellectual acumen today in Afghanistan:

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist said Monday that the Afghan guerrilla war can never be won militarily and called for efforts to bring the Taliban and their supporters into the Afghan government.

The Tennessee Republican said he had learned from briefings that Taliban fighters were too numerous and had too much popular support to be defeated by military means.

"You need to bring them into a more transparent type of government," Frist said during a brief visit to a U.S. and Romanian military base in the southern Taliban stronghold of Qalat. "And if that's accomplished we'll be successful."

Thank God this nitwit is isn't running this year and if he thinks he will ever be President he must be sampling "The Product" in country.

Update: In Frist's defence... Bill Frist.

Update 2: Maybe I jumped the gun? One of the smartest bloggers on the Internet seems to think this is much ado about nothing. Cpt Ed Says:

So what happened? I think that someone confused "Taliban" with "Taliban supporters" at some point, and whether that was Frist or the reporter will probably remain a point of contention between the two. At any rate, Bill Frist is not calling for the return of the Taliban and an end to democracy in Afghanistan.

However, it does bring up an important point about the eventual end game in Afghanistan. If we want a representative democracy in Afghanistan, it will probably be heavily influenced by the Pashtuns, who have a strong Islamist bent. They did, after all, push the Taliban into power. At some point, we have to find a way to convince these Islamists to buy into democracy, and we have to be willing to allow that democracy to develop its own laws and customs. Otherwise, we will have to prop up a strongman who can keep the Pashtuns oppressed, which will create an even greater Islamist impulse in Afghanistan.

 


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Guantanamo Bay Live

Patterico is interviewing an Army Major that was stationed at Gitmo, a real live American hero. As he says:

Oh — I almost forgot the best part. Blogs are an interactive medium, and Stashiu reads this blog. So if you think the interviewer is doing a terrible job, you can jump in yourself. If you have any questions of your own, just ask them. Stashiu has told me that he’ll do his best to respond.

If you ever had any questions about Gitmo, this maybe your one chance to get really, nonspun PC answers.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Guantanamo Bay, The American Gulag

Claudia Rosett just returned from a one day press junket to Gitmo. Her report makes wonder if we could solve the Federal Debt by having Uncle Sam run a chain of resorts:

Only in America would you find authorities trying to cope with terrorist detainees by over-feeding them. We of the media were served the same halal meal as that offered to the detainees, which meant a lunch including — this is only a partial list — spiced meat patty, egg salad, tuna, yogurt, fresh dates, freshly baked bread, juice, and a down-home Middle Eastern dessert, which left us licking from our fingers the honey and nuts of the same baklava we were told is served to Hambali, Abu Zubaydah, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the rest of the gang.

I don't eat this well. All in all, I think certain groups whine too much. Considering what these monsters have done and planned to do, I would just as soon Kick the Red Cross out and let the ASPCA help us set detainee condition rules.

Update: Mark Steyn also made the trip had this to say:

As for being emaciated, it's the only death camp in history where the soi-disant torture victims put on weight. In contrast to the undernourished thesp in the movie version, the average gain at Gitmo is 18 pounds. The Afghan detainees were the chunkiest Afghans I've ever seen. If they ever make it home, their old comrades -- the lean wiry warriors of the Hindu Kush -- will wonder why a party of Florida retirees has suddenly shown up. These Pushtuns are pushing a ton.

And, if you do start losing weight suddenly, don't worry. As one of the camp's medical staff explained, they offer free colon-cancer testing for jihadis over 50. If President Hillary decides to have another crack at socialized medicine in 2009, there are worse slogans than "Every American should have the right to the same health-care plan as a Sudanese terrorist who put his arm out stabbing a prison guard."

Update 2: Forgot the link to Mark Steyn's article.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

US troops under NATO command

It seems as though a deal has been brokered to place a majority of our troops in Afghanistan under NATO command and control.

America’s direct control of military operations in Afghanistan will dwindle to a single air base within days as the NATO alliance assumes a nationwide command that places 12,000 more U.S. troops under its authority, a spokesman for the alliance said Sunday.

The expansion will consolidate military command under top NATO leader British Lt. Gen. David Richards and phase out the role of U.S. Lt. Gen. Karl Eikenberry, whose troops will be transferred to NATO, said Mark Laity, an alliance spokesman in Kabul.

Of 40,000 foreign troops in Afghanistan, only 8,000 U.S. troops will function outside NATO control: those tracking al-Qaida terrorists or involved in air operations, Laity said. The overall level of American forces will remain around 20,000.

This makes me a bit nervous to be honest. This is to the best of my knowledge, the first time in history NATO has been involved in a heavy ground combat situation. Granted, Nato was designed with a major ground war with the Warsaw Pact in mind, but that never materialized. My second misgiving is the training level of the troops involved. Oakleaf at Polipundit speaks well an this point here and here. Lastly there seems to be a lack of will in many NATO countries.

Don't get me wrong. This is still winnable. Eradicate the poppies to steal the Taliban's biggest source of funding, declare all of Waziristan a hot pursuit zone and inject some backbone into the Alliance.That I think would do it. My hope is that this deal can solve the backbone problem. I continue have my doubts that we will fulfill the other two.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

9/11 terrorists further verified to be AQ

Counterterrorism Blog offers a pdf showing several of the 9/11 terrorists at Tarnak Farms, Afganistan listening to a speech given by Bin Laden. Allahpundit at Hot Air offers a more comprehensive look.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Have you seen the Dixie Chick's newest video?

It is pretty entertaining....
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive